If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?
14.06.2025 04:00
Terroristic threats
Child pornography
Trade secrets
New Apple study challenges whether AI models truly “reason” through problems - Ars Technica
No freedom is absolute.
Revenge porn
Revealing classified information
Are you more of a butt guy or a boob guy?
Perjury
Fraud
Threats of violence
What is your language's pangram?
Insurrection
HIPAA violations
And much, much more.
What a list actors/ actresses are notorious for being jerks in real life?
Freedom of speech does not apply to:
Conspiracy
Insider trading
If a narcissist can't feel remorse, can they ever feel regret for an evil act after going to rehab?
That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.
False advertising
You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
What life lesson did you learn the hard way?
You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.